Three dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion using a computer assisted magnetic tracking device
Аннотация
Background and Purpose. The purpose of this study is to investigate the reliability and reproducibility of a magnetic tracking technique for the assessment of overall cervical spine motion (principal and coupled movements). Subjects and Methods. Ten asymptomatic male volunteers with a mean age of 29.3 (range, 20-37 years) years were included in this study. Flexion, extension, left and right lateral bending and left and right axial rotation were measured using a magnetic tracking device mounted onto a custom head piece. A detailed statistical analysis was made to determine the inter-, and intra-observer reliability. Results. High intra- and inter-observer reliability was found in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending indicating that the testing routine is applicable for different examiners. Conclusions and Discussion. The magnetic tracking device method described in our study is a reliable, reproducible method for three dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine. The method is well suited for the clinical assessment of various degenerative and traumatic disorders. It may also supplement different therapeutic procedures and rehabilitation.Литература
Brown R, Burstein A, Nash C, Shock C. Spinal analysis using a three-dimensional radiographic technique. J Biomech 1976;9:335-365
Fielding J. Cineroentgenography of the normal cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1957;39:1280-1288
Jones M. Cineroentgenography of the unstable cervi cal spine. Arch Phys MedRehabil 1966;45:291-295
Dvorak J, Hayek J, Zehnder R. CT-functional diagnostics of the rotatory instability of upper cervical spine. 2: An evaluation on healthy adults and patients with suspected instability. Spine 1987;12:726-731
Dvorak J, Panjabi M, Gerber M, Wichmann W. CT- functional diagnostics of the rotatory instability of upper cervical spine. 1: An experimental study on cadavers. Spine 1987;12:195-205
Penning L, Wilmink J. Rotation of the cervical spine: ACT study in normals. Spine 1987;12:726-731
Alund M, Larsson S-E. Three-dimensional analysis of neck motion. A clinical method. Spine 1990;15:87-91
Dvorak J, Antinnes J, Panjabi M, et al. Age and gender related normal motion of the cervical spine. Spine 1992;17:393-398
Mayer T, Brady S, Bovasso E, et al. Noninvasive measurement of cervical tri-planar motion in normal subjects. Spine 1993;18:2191-2195
Rheault W, Albright B, Byers C, et al. Intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992;15:147-150
Tucci S, Hicks J, Gross E, et al. Cervical motion assessment: Anew, simple and accurate method. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:225-230
Kadir N, Grayson M, Goldberg A, Swain M. New neck goniometer. Rheumatol Rehabil 1981;20:219-226
Ordway N, Seymour R, Donelson R, et al. Cervical sagittal range of motion. Analysis using three methods. Spine 1997;22:501-508
Youdas J, Carey J, Garrett T. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion. Comparison of three methods. Phys Ther 1991;71:98-104
Fisher S, Bowar J, Awad E, Gullickson G. Cervical Orthoses effect on cervical spine motion: Roentgenographic and goniometric method of study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1977;58:109-115
American Medical Association guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 3rd ed. revised Chicago: AMA; 1990.
Capuano-Pucci D, Rheault W, Aukai J, et al. Intratester and intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;2:338-340
Youdas J, Garrett T, Suman V, et al. Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: An initial goniometric study. Phys Ther 1992;72:770-780
Buck C, Dameron F, Dow M, Skowlund H. Study of normal range of motion in the neck utilizing a buble goniometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1959;40:390-392
Lysell E. Motion in the cervical spine. Acta Orthop Scand(Suppl)1969;123:1-61
Fielding J. Cineroentgenography of the normal cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1957;39:1280-1288
Jones M. Cineroentgenography of the unstable cervi cal spine. Arch Phys MedRehabil 1966;45:291-295
Dvorak J, Hayek J, Zehnder R. CT-functional diagnostics of the rotatory instability of upper cervical spine. 2: An evaluation on healthy adults and patients with suspected instability. Spine 1987;12:726-731
Dvorak J, Panjabi M, Gerber M, Wichmann W. CT- functional diagnostics of the rotatory instability of upper cervical spine. 1: An experimental study on cadavers. Spine 1987;12:195-205
Penning L, Wilmink J. Rotation of the cervical spine: ACT study in normals. Spine 1987;12:726-731
Alund M, Larsson S-E. Three-dimensional analysis of neck motion. A clinical method. Spine 1990;15:87-91
Dvorak J, Antinnes J, Panjabi M, et al. Age and gender related normal motion of the cervical spine. Spine 1992;17:393-398
Mayer T, Brady S, Bovasso E, et al. Noninvasive measurement of cervical tri-planar motion in normal subjects. Spine 1993;18:2191-2195
Rheault W, Albright B, Byers C, et al. Intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992;15:147-150
Tucci S, Hicks J, Gross E, et al. Cervical motion assessment: Anew, simple and accurate method. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:225-230
Kadir N, Grayson M, Goldberg A, Swain M. New neck goniometer. Rheumatol Rehabil 1981;20:219-226
Ordway N, Seymour R, Donelson R, et al. Cervical sagittal range of motion. Analysis using three methods. Spine 1997;22:501-508
Youdas J, Carey J, Garrett T. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion. Comparison of three methods. Phys Ther 1991;71:98-104
Fisher S, Bowar J, Awad E, Gullickson G. Cervical Orthoses effect on cervical spine motion: Roentgenographic and goniometric method of study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1977;58:109-115
American Medical Association guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 3rd ed. revised Chicago: AMA; 1990.
Capuano-Pucci D, Rheault W, Aukai J, et al. Intratester and intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;2:338-340
Youdas J, Garrett T, Suman V, et al. Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: An initial goniometric study. Phys Ther 1992;72:770-780
Buck C, Dameron F, Dow M, Skowlund H. Study of normal range of motion in the neck utilizing a buble goniometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1959;40:390-392
Lysell E. Motion in the cervical spine. Acta Orthop Scand(Suppl)1969;123:1-61
Опубликован
2006-05-31
Как цитировать
Gelalis, I., Christoforoul, G., Xenakis, T., Gilbertson, L., & Kang, J. (2006). Three dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion using a computer assisted magnetic tracking device. Bulletin of the International Scientific Surgical Association, 1(3), 25-27. извлечено от http://surgjournal.ru/index.php/BISSA/article/view/106
Выпуск
Раздел
Оригинальные статьи